case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-13 06:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2323 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2323 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #332.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2013-05-14 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
(a) None of that is relevant to the comment you replied to, and (b) that last bit isn't even relevant to arguing the Bible is fictional. It's relevant to arguing Christian mythology as commonly understood has diverged substantially from its primary sources.

Calling something fake implies someone made it up to screw with people, and I think that's unrealistically harsh in most cases. The Bible is mythology, a casserole of history and legend and embellishment and transcription errors like anything else that's been around for that long.

As long as people aren't trying to use it to deny actual empirical evidence, who cares if they do some mental gymnastics to believe it's essentially or symbolically true? (The ones who are using it to deny actual empirical evidence can hit themselves in the face with it.)