Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-09-19 05:19 pm
[ SECRET POST #257 ]
⌈ Secret Post #257 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 074 secrets from Secret Submission Post #037.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 2 ] repeats.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Thursday, September 20th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 21, 35
Re: 21, 35
(Anonymous) 2007-09-19 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)But they're still both Girls in Boy Costume. Both characters, Peter and Sheik, depend upon the hope that people will assume they're boys.
The bottom line for me is this: She's dressing up as a very particular boy. End of. She's not dressing up as an ambiguous hooded character, she's not putting on pants and hoping to pass for anyone other than Zelda; she's taken on a very specific identity, that of a young Sheikah man named Sheik. She's doing it to save her life and her kingdom, which is more crucial than anything. No one who knew her secret (Impa?) would call Sheik a "she" and risk blowing everything any more than anyone on stage with Mary would risk calling Peter a "she" and blow the show.
Re: 21, 35
I can understand preferring male pronouns in fics, especially for the manga-canon (which cannot be applied backwards to game canon. They're two different things), but to the point where you're bitchy at Nintendo? Who MADE Sheik and Zelda and whatever connection and/or possible sex-change there in? And therefore have the final say on whether or not it IS a chick (which it is)? Just makes you look rather dumb and angry in my eyes. Not a pretty combination.
Re: 21, 35
(Anonymous) 2007-09-19 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)I see now I wasn't very clear. I'm not saying Sheik the Character in the Zelda series is biologically male. Sheik the Character in the Zelda series is Zelda in disguise. I'm saying Sheik the Character that Zelda is Playing in the World Of Hyrule is a male, or as male as a fictional identity can get, because he isn't a real person, but no one else knows that, so as far as Ruto and anyone else who meets him is concerned, he's just this guy. There are no Y chromosomes or penises (penii?) involved.
I just think of it from Zelda's point of view. If she's going to through all this trouble to look like a guy, Sheik deserves male pronouns.
And for the record, I'm not bitchy at nintendo. I'm bitchy at the fans. I consider SSBM an unfortunate slip up that isn't true to the source material, but it gets extra points for giving Zelda's Sheik form a deeper sounding voice.
Re: 21, 35
Btw, you handled my snarky reply veeeery maturely and I therefore you are now more than alright in my book. And I do take most of that snarky back.
Re: 21, 35
Re: 21, 35
It's kinda like Ranma.
Re: 21, 35
I see what you're trying to say. And on that level, I understand what you were saying, but yes, it came across a little wrong. (But then it's a bit hard to get everything out there in a tiny secret! ;D) Sheik is meant to be male, and for the record, I never thought anything different. I'm just glad that you understand Sheik is Zelda in disguise and that they're one and the same. So many people out there who think they're two completely seperate people.