[ SECRET POST #2325 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2325 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #332.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, this. I can definitely interpret the scene as foe yay, but if I sit down and analyze what I think was going on, your explanation is definitely what I end up with (at least as a major part of it). Silva's sexuality is irrelevant - the scene is about power dynamics and about who has the upper hand in that situation.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah. I mean, Silva could be bi. He could even be flat gay, and sleeping with women was just a blind or a deception or just pure habit from the job. It's really, really difficult to tell what the original sexualities might have been when sex is as much part of the job as anything done for personal pleasure for these people.

I actually do like that about the Craig!Bond era, that they went some way to explore the effects that has on Bond and other characters.

[(Anonymous)]

Absolutely - I keep wondering about Bond as well, and it's an interesting thought to toy with. What I hit on in this scene is just something else entirely.

Me too. I'm not a fan of the older movies and only started watching the Craig era ones because they're starting to explore those effects and psychology and all that (I haven't seen many of the non-Craig movies, and what I have seen was years and years ago, so I will admit my perspective could be skewed here, but the old ones always struck me as not at all interested in those aspects).

[(Anonymous)]

The older movies didn't really touch on the sexual implications, no. Bond was pretty much the straightest man on the planet and sex on the job was a perk rather than a duty. It didn't really go into the costs of that or the way it was using Bond as much as it was using the people he slept with.

Some of them did touch rather well on the emotional and psychological trauma of the job, though. Dalton was good at that, but then I liked Dalton and few other people do. Also Lazenby, whose Bond genuinely fell in love with one of his marks, married her, and was utterly crushed when she was killed. There's some good stuff in the older Bonds, they just don't go into the direct, pointed level of detail in this area that the Craig!Bonds do.

[(Anonymous)]

That was pretty much my impression! Never did appeal to me.

Sounds like Dalton and Lazenby might be worth a watch, though, I'll definitely keep that in mind, thanks :)

[(Anonymous)]

To warn you, On Her Majesty's Secret Service (Lazenby) gets severely mixed reviews. The story is good, the execution is questionable. I liked it, especially the last scene, but it's not everyone's cup of tea.