case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-19 03:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #2329 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2329 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 083 secrets from Secret Submission Post #333.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-19 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sure the author of this piece (not to mention the site runners) appreciates the clicks you've stolen from them by posting this article in its entirety.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-19 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL. I learned about it from tumblr w/o any cites at all. I had to google for this. I also included the link. I included the article itself since the link won't hyperlink and I've seen people whine their off here about not clicking on strange links/going to the site--viruses, etc. you know.

Piss off.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-19 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, aren't you a peach.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-19 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Sure am. I'm firm and delicious.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-19 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
DA If the readers cares,let them go the website. Its there at the end. Did you do that since you're so concerned about this poor author? Add to his click count?

Do you realize you're on F!S (and honestly most fandomers anywhere)where people pirate their media? How about buying it instead? Hmmmmmmmm?

(Anonymous) 2013-05-20 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
I did go to the site, but I know not everybody who read the whole thing will. And it's not about "letting the reader do this extra step if they care" it's about a content creator getting compensated for their work. I wouldn't mind so much if Anon had just posted an excerpt with a link to the rest, but posting it in it's entirety is out of line, and I'll stand by that forever.

DA

(Anonymous) 2013-05-20 08:45 am (UTC)(link)
This is a true account, so theoretically I could retell the entire thing by mouth to a group of people over lunch today and give no links and there'd be nothing anyone could do to stop me. What's the damn difference?

(Anonymous) 2013-05-23 12:46 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

You do realize that the article in question primarily rips off the majority of a thousand word essay by Dana Reinhardt on the Quest For Kindness blog in the exact same way, right? It's pretty hypocritical to rip on someone for posting an 840 word article with a link at the end when said article "includes" a direct "quote" consisting of 719 words of a 1005 word essay that has a link at the end to the original essay. When around 85% of your article is around 71% of someone else's work, what did you create beside the frame? Do you really think someone deserve to be compensated for basically reposting someone else's content?

(Anonymous) 2013-05-20 08:29 am (UTC)(link)
hi author of the article, here via pingback

that author is recounting someone else's story to make money so I'm not particularly fussed for their .4 eights of a cent

(Anonymous) 2013-05-20 05:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Hey, genius, pingbacks require the actual creation of a real link to a page, not the copy pasta of plain text.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-20 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)
there's a link right there at the bottom of the text so yeah

(Anonymous) 2013-05-21 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
You really don't know how pingbacks work, do you? just typing a link in plain text doesn't give off a pingback. Pingabacks are only created when there's an html coded link that somebody can *click on* to get to the destination.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-21 05:46 am (UTC)(link)
Hey 'genius', did you know that links for

(Anonymous) 2013-05-21 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
Hey 'genius', did you know that links and images for anonymous comments work properly when you click on 'reply to this comment'? The person you replied to did know what they were talking about.

Sincerely,

A passing-by anon.