[ SECRET POST #2335 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2335 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 095 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[dreemyweird]

Sorry, I think you're a troll. Putting people into prison for reading certain kinds of fiction is a thousand times worse than producing narratives of any degree of repulsing.

[(Anonymous)]

Typical F!S, anyone who has an "extreme" opinion is a troll. I think you're the troll, for wasting my time on what could have been a fruitful debate.

[dreemyweird]

Well, you're partly right, normally I don't like the tendency to call everyone who disagrees with f!sers "a troll". This is frustrating.

In this case, however, I see a person whose statements are harsh, promote the ultimate form of Thought Police-like systems (not even simply "put everyone who writes/reads rape and paedophilia into prison", but "put everyone who gets off to this into prison"), who states that there's an "overriding culture that says that [rape and paedophilia] are okay", and who displays poor understanding of the way fiction works.

True, you may not be a troll, but do you really want to argue with me in a reasonable and level-headed way? Hypothetically I wouldn't even mind. One of the difficulties, however, is that we appear to have very different moral grounds, and, since morality is a highly subjective and often irrational thing, I am unsure if we would be able to find a point from which we could start the discussion.

[(Anonymous)]

Your morality is "it's okay to get off to rape and pedophilia if it's fiction. If you disagree, it's because you don't understand fiction."

And you cry "Thought Police!" and deny the existence of rape culture. Damn, you're good, you got me there.

[dreemyweird]

No, that's not what I am saying. In fact, my previous comment did not mention the exact aspect of my position I was referring to, but my point is that depicting rape=/=codonement, and yes, I think that you understand the mechanics of literature poorly if you disagree with this.

It would've been slightly more valid if you said "sympathetic depiction of rape=codonement", and even in this case... well, all right, we could argue about this case, if you want.

I did not deny the existence of rape culture, I simply doubt that it's overriding.

And there's a big difference between proposing to put people into prison for reading things and thinking that somebody understands something the wrong way. Seriously, are you comparing the situations?

[dethtoll]

forget it dreemy it's anontown