[ SECRET POST #2336 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2336 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Women w/longer ring finger more likely to be lesbian

[(Anonymous)]

The women w/that are more likely to be lesbian.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/dec/01/what-finger-length-says-about-you
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digit_ratio read this one for cites and how hormones impact development

google women with longer ring finger lesbian

Re: Women w/longer ring finger more likely to be lesbian

[(Anonymous)]

ok we get it, spammy mcspammer. thanks for the constant insistence on googling that



you obviously REALLY want people to accept some guardian interpretation of a scientific study as fact as well as wikipedia article (altho it could be accurate it isn't detailed or persuasive enough imo)?

some of us are actual scientists

and are suspicious of people equating causality with correlation, esp in small representative samples among many other factors