Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-29 06:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #2339 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2339 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
Which... loses its charm after the first couple of times you see the episode and you know where all the "Boo!" parts are.
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-29 23:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I dunno; as a woman, being sent back in time sounds pretty damn scary. And, hey, imagine being a Black person sent back to pre-Civil War US, or a Jew sent to 1940's Europe in a country controlled by the Nazis...
Honestly, I think it would have been great if they had actually explored that idea that, ya know, a lot of history hasn't been terribly a kind to a lot of people, and a lot of types of people would kinda be screwed if they got sent back far enough...
E.T.A.: TO say nothing of people (like myself) with certain medial conditions that would pretty much leave them screwed if they went back in time. In same cases, it wouldn't even have to be very far...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-31 02:59 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 01:29 am (UTC)(link)I'm glad for you that you didn't find it frightening, but it's hardly just about jumping out and yelling, "Boo!"
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-30 07:34 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
Like...sure, you may find them not scary at all and you have no obligation to do so, because it's not like you can force your brain to be scared of something that you don't find scary. But by that same token, the reverse applies as well. Unlike, say, "the Master is the best villain in the show", which is a statement that can be debated and argued with evidence and reasoning, the angels' merit is based on their ability to scare people, which by its very definition cannot be evaluated and deemed overrated or underrated by any criteria except for how many people they scared, and how badly they scared them.
Now, a person can definitely argue that the Angels are overrated characters in other areas. Like, say, the basic rules of consistency and internal logic. But I don't think the angels can be argued to be overrated because they didn't personally scare some particular person.
Sorry if that made no sense...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 01:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 02:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 07:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-29 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)But I didn't find them scary in Angels Take Manhattan... they were just a mess there.
no subject
But the Angels Take Manhattan just destroyed any creep factor they used to have for me.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-29 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)The Angels were interesting, I thought, and I was even okay with them the second time they made an appearance. That was it. Like, seriously, there are dozens upon dozens of world out there and you HAVE to re-use the same monsters over and over? Seriously?
Don't even get me started on the cybermen and Daleks (especially the fucking Daleks).
no subject
no subject
...except I don't think that just because I prefer them less scary, that somehow means it's an objectively "good thing" that they're less scary. That ruins the experience for the millions of other fans who weren't as disturbed by them as I was. Who am I to make judgements based solely on my personal foibles? Particularly as their unscariness came along with gaping plotholes and inconsistencies that made no sense.
Also, what mainly made them less disturbingly scary to me was the fact that in Blink, the Doctor was stuck in 1969, and couldn't come and save Sally and Larry. Whereas the Doctor was there with them in subsequent appearances. Yeah, that didn't make a damn difference in safety levels in the plot, but psychologically...it made a BIG difference.
no subject
So apparently I'm the only one still scared by the Weeping Angels...?
Re: So apparently I'm the only one still scared by the Weeping Angels...?
Re: So apparently I'm the only one still scared by the Weeping Angels...?
Re: So apparently I'm the only one still scared by the Weeping Angels...?
Re: So apparently I'm the only one still scared by the Weeping Angels...?
(Anonymous) 2013-05-31 06:47 pm (UTC)(link)And then there was cake!
http://cakewrecks-feed.dreamwidth.org/381162.html
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 01:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 02:02 am (UTC)(link)And then they had to start talking - and it was like, "Seriously? Why would they even give a damn about taunting the Doctor? Way to be cliche villians, Angels". They were much more frightening as impassive and unrelenting predators.
Add in the 'not moving because they don't know Amy can't see them' BS, and the mystique, it was dead.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 10:50 am (UTC)(link)is doctor who just allergic to thinking about things for more than four seconds?