case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-06-06 06:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #2347 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2347 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Jay from Red Letter Media]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Bob's Burgers]


__________________________________________________



04.
[CL from 2NE1]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Moriarty/Sherlock Holmes]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Of Monsters and Men and Glitch (game)]


__________________________________________________



07.
[After Man: A Zoology of the Future]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Hetalia]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Bubble Guppies]


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 010 secrets from Secret Submission Post #335.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Guy Gamers

(Anonymous) 2013-06-06 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
did you not learn from yesterday, when you said that what you meant was that "gaming is an attractive feature" and people said "then why the fuck didn't you say THAT"? Because if this is the same question, you will get similar responses. Ask what you mean.

Re: Guy Gamers

(Anonymous) 2013-06-06 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
What happened yesterday? Linkie?

But anyway, how the fuck is "Discuss weather boy who play games are hotter than boys who don't" any different from "Gaming is a attractive feature Y/N?"

Re: Guy Gamers

(Anonymous) 2013-06-06 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
It was, apparently, VERY different yesterday (although the thread yesterday had the key difference that it was "girls" instead of "boys")

I really wonder how different the whole thing would have been if OP had done the threads in the reverse order

Re: Guy Gamers

(Anonymous) 2013-06-06 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Either of those phrasings would have been fine, but OP decided to go a different route.

Re: Guy Gamers

(Anonymous) 2013-06-06 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I legit don't see the difference (or a big difference) between the Op's post, and the first statement.

Re: Guy Gamers

(Anonymous) 2013-06-07 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
There's a definite difference in general feel and tone. One is welcoming you into a discussion or debate and the second is more of a challenge. It's subtle but there and in a place like FS it makes a difference in if you want actual discussion or to just rile people up.

Re: Guy Gamers

(Anonymous) 2013-06-06 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
actually it kind of seems like it is different from yesterday, in that the responses mainly fall into two categories: people who remember the brouhaha yesterday, and people who are answering the question seriously

Re: Guy Gamers

(Anonymous) 2013-06-07 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
Except that they're not getting the same responses, you jackass. They're getting a completely different set. People are actually answering the question, which says something pretty awful about the attitudes here.

Re: Guy Gamers

(Anonymous) 2013-06-07 01:53 pm (UTC)(link)
so what IS your main malfunction in this conversation?