Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-06-06 06:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #2347 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2347 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Jay from Red Letter Media]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Bob's Burgers]
__________________________________________________
04.

[CL from 2NE1]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Moriarty/Sherlock Holmes]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Of Monsters and Men and Glitch (game)]
__________________________________________________
07.

[After Man: A Zoology of the Future]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Hetalia]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Bubble Guppies]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 010 secrets from Secret Submission Post #335.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Guy Gamers
If I were to date, I would like to do it with someone who understood and appreciated one of my most enjoyed hobbies to a similar extent I did. However, it would not make them more sexually attractive, and nor would it be more important to me to date a 'gamer' than someone who doesn't game but I have better chemistry with.
There is a difference between saying 'I think gaming is hot' and 'Only men/women who play games are attractive'. The first is a preference, the second a generalisation. The latter is as offensive as saying 'only girls with big boobs are hot' as opposed to 'I think big boobs are hot' - you're reducing a person down to one particular element and claiming that it is that aspect only that defines how attractive they are.
It's fine to have a preference. Everybody does. It's not okay to generalise.