case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-06-16 03:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #2357 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2357 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 112 secrets from Secret Submission Post #336.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2013-06-17 09:36 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. What I was saying was that people on TV Tropes look at something that has gratuitous sex in it, and they follow the following logical process:

1. If a work has gratuitous sex in it, it's bad.
2. This is not a bad work.
3. This work does not have gratuitous sex.

Then they make up all sorts of excuses for how the sex furthers the plot or the characterization, some of which are pretty obviously reaching.

I guess what I want most is honesty. If they want to take premise 1 as true, they should approach 3 as a falsifiable proposition, rather than a conclusion. If they then dislike something they otherwise would have liked because it has gratuitous sex, so be it. (Some would argue that would qualify as an improvement in their taste.)

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2013-06-17 09:37 am (UTC)(link)
P.S. I posted a secret a while back about using FS to practice saying things in as few words as possible. This is the downside of that practice--sometimes I need a lot of words to adequately explain what the hell I'm thinking.