ext_82219 ([identity profile] shahni.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-09-26 02:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #264 ]


⌈ Secret Post #264 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35. [ not!secret ]

36.

37.

38.



Notes:
- With luck, I'll be here when this gets posted, otherwise, first comment goes to name that fandom!

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 82 secrets from Secret Submission Post #038.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [1] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [1] repeat
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Thursday, September 27th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

9 secret-maker

(Anonymous) 2007-09-27 06:10 am (UTC)(link)
Actually. . . I only used L's image because he's the character who had the loudest discussion on the diagnosis in my memory; whether or not I agree with it is up in the air. From my own personal experience with high-functioning autistics, it could very well work. It's mostly the behavior of people during their discussions that makes me so craaazy.

Re: 9 secret-maker

[identity profile] moving.livejournal.com 2007-09-27 09:54 am (UTC)(link)
High-functioning autistics is exactly why I said it's a question that can be stirred to no end. Thing is, I mostly agree with the "L fits the description" argument until people start claiming he actually does have autism, or like you said, start treating it like a personality trait. The fact that L is weird doesn't necessarily mean he can or should be diagnosed as an autistic, but it's still interesting to discuss. Which was my point. People theorize in hopes of understanding something. And they should keep at it, in my opinion.

Now if said people weren't so careless with how they voiced their opinion fandom wouldn't have half as much drama and butthurt.