case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-07-04 06:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #2375 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2375 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #339.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-07-05 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
Assuming what you say about Elementary going OUT OF ITS WAY to do right what BBC Sherlock does wrong is true, then your resentment is silly because Elementary started only after all of Sherlock's run that is currently out came out. So they had the opportunity to learn from Sherlock's example (because you KNOW the writers of Elementary have their eye on it and always have, originally they wanted to do just a straight remake), but Moffat hasn't had time yet to do the same.
lex_antonia: (Default)

[personal profile] lex_antonia 2013-07-05 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
but Moffat hasn't had time yet to do the same.

Loooooooooooooooooool

*tears in my eyes*

(Anonymous) 2013-07-05 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Actually I think the anon you replied to has a fair point. Sherlock had two seasons for everyone to criticise to pieces before Elementary had aired one episode. If I were the writers/producers for the latter I would have read as much of what viewers didn't like and made damn sure my show was different in that way too.


lex_antonia: (Poe)

[personal profile] lex_antonia 2013-07-05 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
Generally speaking, sure. Moffat specifically? No. His track record is very telling.

(Anonymous) 2013-07-05 11:16 am (UTC)(link)
Yep he makes quality and sucessful television which the vast majority enjoy and find entertaining and intelligent. That is a pretty good track record. Of course he has picked some weird-ass haters along the way, but you are going to get tinfoil hatters in any sphere.
lex_antonia: (Mick)

[personal profile] lex_antonia 2013-07-05 11:30 am (UTC)(link)
Oh for fuck's sake, I am a fan of his. Doesn't mean I have to pretend there's nothing worth criticising about his writing, or that he's dealt with criticism particularly well in the past.

(Anonymous) 2013-07-05 12:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Kind of like the tinfoil hat Moffat lovers who think that he is absolutely perfect and completely above any and all criticism?

(Anonymous) 2013-07-05 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Isn't Moffat the dude that *explicitly* said he didn't think people should criticize him?

Because apparently he wants to live in a circle jerk of appreciation.

(Anonymous) 2013-07-05 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
Moffat's been in the business for at least a couple decades now and has never shown any inclination to improve on the stuff he's mishandling in Sherlock. Not to mention that he shouldn't need another Sherlock Holmes show to serve as a wake-up call in the first place.

(Anonymous) 2013-07-05 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Ha ha ha. Moffatt isn't interested in learning from criticis of his shows (if that is what you mean by that odd phrasing), he has shown that time and time again. Time has nothing to do with it.