[ SECRET POST #2384 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2384 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #341.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Verdict: Not Guilty

[(Anonymous)]

Which is exactly the reason they should have charged him with manslaughter. There wasn't enough evidence to convict for murder 2. The jury had no choice but to determine guilty or not guilty of murder 2; they can't come back and say "Well, he's guilty of this thing you didn't charge him with instead." The prosecutor is the one who fucked this all up and actually knew it at the time, but it was easier to go with the higher charge knowing he'd skate and put the blame on the jury instead of looking soft by going with the charge they could actually convict on.

Re: Verdict: Not Guilty

[(Anonymous)]

Except it sounds like the jury had the option to find him guilty of manslaughter? I really wish they'd done that.

Re: Verdict: Not Guilty

[chardmonster]

No. Manslaughter in Florida requires the killing have no legal reason. Self defense is a legal reason, and the prosecution could not prove that he was not acting in self defense. If you have reasonable doubt, you have to find not guilty. That's only fair. If you're angry about that, you have to change the law itself, not go after the guy who got away with pitchforks.