Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2013-07-16 06:53 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2013-07-16 06:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #2387 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2387 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
__________________________________________________
13.
__________________________________________________
14.
__________________________________________________
15.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #341.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-17 01:19 am (UTC)(link)You don't have to read the entirety of Twilight not to see the problematic aspects of it. This shows in the fact you agreed with her until you found out she hadn't read it. She still has points. You still agree with her criticism that it has an anti-women, pro-abuse attitude? Then what does it matter. She may not know the finer details of what Bella is thinking, but she knows the overall themes/actions. Hell, the wiki summary shows it quite well. You don't need to read every page backwards/forwards to criticise the general themes.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-17 01:32 am (UTC)(link)Besides the problematic aspects, the rest of the book is poorly-written, nonsensical filler.
no subject
no subject
So what you're saying is "To bee, continued"?
no subject
no subject