case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-07-16 06:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2387 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2387 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #341.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
krait: a sea snake (krait) swimming (Default)

Late reply is late, yep.

[personal profile] krait 2013-08-03 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
So... someone did research about a book... and drew a conclusion that you admit is correct... but you're mad because she did her research instead of reading a terrible book?

I see this attitude a lot in fandom, and I really don't understand it. Guess what, it's possible to be interested in something (or upset by a rumour about something) and find out the facts about it without having to actually subject yourself to that thing! This is why my friend knows a lot about Ancient Greek government without actually building a time machine to go back and live under it, and why I have never eaten kale but can conclude that the odds are against my liking it because I dislike spinach and three other types of greens.

I've never read 50 Shades, either, but I have read:
* reviews both positive and negative by people who have read it
* direct quotes from the text
* analysis by people who make a living analysing texts
* analysis of factors within the text, written by people who have life experience of same (BDSM, abusive relationships, sexual agency)

I don't think that my conclusions about the book are somehow invalid because I refuse to read it. NOT reading 300 pages of bad porn in order to determine that it's bad porn doesn't give me anything I didn't get from other sources; in fact, doing it the longer, less direct way meant I didn't have to read 300 pages of bad porn, PLUS I got to read some other great stuff - useful things like signs of an abusive realationship, thinky thoughts on tropes and female-directed romance, and even recs for good porn!

krait: a sea snake (krait) swimming (Default)

Re: Late reply is late, yep.

[personal profile] krait 2013-08-03 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
PS - Your bee is really cute, though!