[ SECRET POST #2392 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2392 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #342.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Reviewing fic with annoying author's note?

[thene]

This is kinda why opinionated author's notes should be avoided at all costs. It's sometimes a maturity litmus test, even; are you big enough to not insist on the last word? If you've got something more to say, save it for a comment response or a meta thread, ffs.

I tend to be pretty direct about stuff like that, at least as far as saying 'I disagree with you about x, x is awesome and doesn't need bashing' - I figure engagement beats pass-agg silence treatment stuff every time. Fandom doesn't need less commenting.