case: ([ Etna; Hee. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-10-01 04:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #269 ]


⌈ Secret Post #269 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.



Notes:

1. The F!S Friending Meme! Go do it! I am totally open to friending. (:
2. Have some emopuppy in a fish tank!
3. BECAUSE I CAN: TAKE THIS POLL BUTTMUNCHERS FTW

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 168 secrets from Secret Submission Post #039.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken link, 0 not!secrets, [ 1 2 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2007-10-01 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
5 - Uh, I wouldn't call Izumi a lead female, but god do I hate senseless female-character bashing. (Why the hell would anyone bash Izumi, anyway??)

7 - .........Wow. Um. Okay, so Eragon was cliched as hell and borrowed heavily from Eddings, I've heard as bad if not worse about Twilight, and I know nothing about The Amulet of Samarkand, but His Dark Materials was damned good.

Seriously, though... Nothing will beat Harry Potter?

...my god. I just... I don't honestly know what to say to that. I can't find the words to tell you how... how WRONG you are. You'll miss out on so many things just because people keep making those stupid comparisons to HP just because they happen to both be young adult fantasy novels -- utter bullshit, if you ask me.

I'm so, so sorry for you.

11 - ...I adore that font.

12 - Fuckin' Akatsuki. That shit is why I left the damn fandom to begin with, and reading this secret, if the atmosphere's that bad I'm glad I haven't gone back.

15 - Ahaha, YES. I've had epic conversations with my friends about what alignments and classes our favorite video game characters would be. Trust me, you're not alone.

21 - ...bzuh? I try to find the words to respond to this secret, but every time I do I just end up thinking of this one fic I read where two characters who weren't related roleplayed incest and it was one of the hottest fucking things I've ever read and my brain just kinda stops. *cough*

24 - If I ever got off my lazy ass and published shit, I would so love to see what the fans would do as far as ships and stuff go. Heck, if I knew I wouldn't get my ass sued for making money off of ideas possibly lifted from someone's fic of my stuff, I'd participate in the fandom myself.

37 - Different fandom, same shit. :/

21

(Anonymous) 2007-10-01 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
OP here.

It's not that I have something against inherently incestuous pairings, but it's the particular bond between those two. It's DEFINITELY familial, but it's... still fairly unique to them. They have a very interesting and compelling dynamic that makes their relationship by far one of my favorites in the entire series. But too often, I think people who ship them try to sugar-coat their established relationship and ignore that hugely important dynamic, which is what I was trying to say here in the secret.

Re: 21

(Anonymous) 2007-10-01 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
which is what I was trying to say here in the secret.

and failed miserably too.

Re: 21

(Anonymous) 2007-10-01 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't feel it was that much of a failure; there are spots I could have phrased it better, but to me it still gets the point across.

Hm. Perhaps, therein, lies the problem. It gets the point across "to me" when I already know what I'm talking about >_>

Re: 21

(Anonymous) 2007-10-02 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
Wow, that's condescending. Just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean that they don't "get" what you're talking about.

Re: 21

[identity profile] kinneas.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
It seems to have made sense to most people.

"If you want to ship it as an incestuous pairing, that's fine," is pretty glaringly obvious.

Re: 21

(Anonymous) 2007-10-02 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
actually it didn't since a lot of people seemed to have issues with how she phrased it.

Re: 21

[identity profile] kinneas.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Issues with the losing respect bit, not the sweeping generalization (of which there is none) regarding all MxF shippers.