[ SECRET POST #2393 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2393 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [tb]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #342.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fuchsiascreams]

Honestly, I totally agree with you about his tedious writing style (which is the reason why I haven't read the 'Lord of the Rings' series either), but 'The Hobbit' is completely different. It's not even comparable to Lord of the Rings in terms of his long-winded writing style. The action starts immediately and it is very succinct and to the point. Give it a try, you might like it. C: I'm a huge Tolkien fan (of the world and its history, not of Lord of the Rings), and I hated the LoTR books, but I loved The Hobbit.

[(Anonymous)]

On the other hand, I've tried multiple times to read The Hobbit. I can't get into it, because it's too cut and dry. I had a lot more success with LOTR.

I also read The Hobbit, LOTR, and The Silm all as an adult, so YMMV.