[ SECRET POST #2394 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2394 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #342.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Except OP didn't say any of that. They just implied they can't enjoy it, for reasons unknown.

[(Anonymous)]

Which obviously has nothing to do with the imposition of gendered, misogynistic, homophobic sexual roles (why does the OP assume that only one man's cock can/should get sucked??). Nothing to do with the idea that cocksucking, like getting penetrated, is a weak thing to do, and since in a m/m pairing one man has to be "the woman" (of course!), obviously only one man will suck cock.

Can we please not pretend that a bunch of hugely culturally-freighted stuff about sex acts and gender and power isn't there just because the OP didn't spell it out?

[(Anonymous)]

What irks me about the way you write this is that you skip a step. There's the incredibly irksome "feminine* guys automatically bottom" (this is real and a problem) and bottoms always deliver oral (this is not in any way reliably true in slashfic, but the association of such a basic sex act with dominance or submission can indeed problematic if it's attached to an author or a group of people rather than, say, a character's personal opinions in one story - some real people have this association, so placing it is only problematic if it is done consistently and always in the same direction).

* Whatever the fuck that even means - I know it when I see it, but the criteria are such a bunch of bullshit that it's hard not to start twitching.