[ SECRET POST #2406 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2406 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Are you one who thinks sexual identity is a "lifestyle" as well?

I'm pretty sure you're just trolling, but I"d be genuinely interested in hearing your reasoning here. I mean, I'm of the thought that there isn't a single thing that "doesn't belong in fandom". There's a lot of stuff I don't want to read, but fandom is for exploration of themes and characters and tropes.

[(Anonymous)]

Are you one who thinks sexual identity is a "lifestyle" as well?

Um, I'm not inferring anything else as well. This topic is about trans* and I made my point.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

You haven't actually made a point at all. You've made a bald assertion, which is different than a point.

[(Anonymous)]

You haven't made a point. You've declared that you have an opinion, and...then you've said exactly nothing to back it up, aside from, "other people have this opinion too."

Unless your point is that trolling works.

[(Anonymous)]

Why are you referring to an argument earlier in the thread as if it's relevant to the discussion now?

[(Anonymous)]

Why are you avoiding providing any supports for your position?