case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-05 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #2407 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2407 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
mekkio: (Default)

[personal profile] mekkio 2013-08-05 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Are you me. I am tired of the clueless fans grabbing at anything to prove that Dean is in love with Castiel. Even if it is completely out of character or wrong. Like there was one scene in which Dean was talking to Castiel about the Angel searching for information and Dean called Cas, "Huggybear" because of this. The Destiel fans clamped on this as proof that Dean was in love with Castiel, otherwise, in their minds, why would Dean call Castiel such a cute, pet name. Never mind in reality the writers were making a Starsky and Hutch reference. Huggybear was an informant. But, no. To Destiel fans this was all the proof they needed for their ship. Trying to convince otherwise is like pulling teeth.

What I hate the most is them starting to harass the actors over it. No. Just no.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
OTOH, it is pretty damn funny when they so spectacularly miss the point and run off on an entirely different tangent based on that misinformation. I got the "Huggybear" reference and I've never seen Starsky & Hutch.