case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-05 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #2407 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2407 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #344.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
Lololol. I'm pretty sure you're woobifying Hannibal Lecter. Then again, internet and fangirls.

The man isn't Dexter.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
And I'm pretty sure you don't know much about Hannibal Lecter. He never killed teenage girls in the books.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
He may not have murdered teenaged girls in the books, but he did murder women to place them in with a breast exposed like the famous Italian painting Primavera.

It's not a far stretch for him to murder teenage girls, especially if they happen to be in position to further his twisted agenda.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
So basically you acknowledge that he's never done such a thing in four novels but then infer that he could do it. Ok.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
Never having been shown in that position is not the same as would not do it.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 02:48 am (UTC)(link)
This. The man never had a reason to kill any teenaged girls. But I'm sure if he felt it necessary, he wouldn't have hesitated.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
He's killed someone for not playing the flute right. If killing teenage girls was part of his modus operandi he would have.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
The man's not a pedophile. When would he have been in so much contact with teenaged girls that you can say definitively that he wouldn't have found a reason?

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
By your own logic, how do you know he's not a pedophile? Just because we didn't see him molest any kids, doesn't mean he wouldn't do it.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 12:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 12:05 pm (UTC)(link)
To

(Anonymous) 2013-08-06 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for proving my point.