[ SECRET POST #2412 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2412 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 093 secrets from Secret Submission Post #345.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: would you judge a man for using a prostitute?

[(Anonymous)]

I think I might judge a man who did not first do due diligence to try to find out whether the prostitute he was patronizing was not being coerced or otherwise taken advantage of, and was freely consenting to the arrangement. A sex-for-money business transaction between consenting parties is not morally wrong, but I think it's the would-be buyer's responsibility to ensure that this is what's actually going on.