case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-14 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2416 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2416 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________




02.


__________________________________________________




03.


__________________________________________________




04.


__________________________________________________




05.


__________________________________________________




06.


__________________________________________________




07.


__________________________________________________




08.


__________________________________________________




09.


__________________________________________________




10.


__________________________________________________




11.


__________________________________________________




12.


__________________________________________________




13.


__________________________________________________




14.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #345.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-15 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
I agree that it was mediocre, plus: I could not help it, I was mortified to discover a committee of middle-aged white guys had decided they were the people to make this very, very non-colorblind film, a fairy tale film centering around a poor New Orleans girl of color. Perhaps the film was fine, perhaps it was tastefully done, perhaps they were not wrong in doing so, but it didn't matter, it mortified me.

I am sorry I am anon for this. I just haven't had the courage to argue this one under my own name.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-15 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I really don't understand why that would mortify you.

(Anonymous) 2013-08-15 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
So, is this some version of the old "you can't write about it unless you are it" fallacy?