[ SECRET POST #2417 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2417 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #345.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: warning for sort of anti-trans sentiments?

[(Anonymous)]

I'm sure they appreciate your input, because they seem to appreciate everyone's input. That said? There is no consistent warning system across the internet, and there are many people who don't warn when they should (usually because they forget, occasionally because they're inconsiderate dicks). Transcript anon is wisely erring on the side of caution because they're a nice person, and it harms exactly no one to attach a possibly inaccurate warning to a fandom secret.

Re: warning for sort of anti-trans sentiments?

[(Anonymous)]

SA

I take your point. But in general if I were the secret-maker I'd be quite fucked off at having a warning like this -with which she almost certainly doesn't agree- treated as part of a transcription. And in this specific case, I think that the warning is actually inaccurate (or at least subjective) enough to actually be counter-productive.