[ SECRET POST #2419 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2419 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Way early because taking dog to the vet. :c

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #346.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Thank youu

[applemagpie]

For actually adding something insightful and intelligent to this whole 'is Neil Gaiman sexist' discussion

Re: Thank youu

[nyxelestia]

I think one problem is if a male writer creates a few good female characters or comments on it (much like Whedon or del Toro), then they get set-up as some kind of feminist amongst bigots in media, when reality is much closer to, they aren't sexists in an industry that is very sexist. Of course, not sexist =/= feminist, so when these men inevitably fall short of feminists' expectations, they get branded as sexists, often by people who were bitter and resentful beforehand about all the brouhaha surrounding what they always thought of as 'not that extraordinary, why are you people so obsessed over this?'.