case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-20 06:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #2422 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2422 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Mortal Instruments]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Journey]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Claire Danes/Homeland]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Mortal Kombat]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Pacific Rim]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Pacific Rim]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Reign]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Arrested Development]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Supernatural, Scottie Thompson]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Man From U.N.C.L.E]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #346.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
nyxelestia: Rose Icon (Default)

I think this is a terminology problem

[personal profile] nyxelestia 2013-08-20 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I was about to go onto FFR to rant about this, actually.

"Crossover" would be the Pacific Rim characters and setting interacting with and within another fandom's setting, or characters. That's an entirely different thing from a Pacific Rim AU, or a Jaeger AU, in which the characters of another fandom are Jaeger pilots or living in the Pacific Rim universe.

A LOT of people are labelling their Pacific Rim AUs as crossovers, and I can definitely see why someone would be pissed off about this.

Re: I think this is a terminology problem

(Anonymous) 2013-08-21 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
That annoys me in every context, really.

I am weird and pedantic / neurotic about crossovers I guess. There are very strict rules (in my head, that I made up, that no one else follows)

Re: I think this is a terminology problem

(Anonymous) 2013-08-21 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Same here, anon. Same here.

Re: I think this is a terminology problem

(Anonymous) 2013-08-21 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
I agree completely. That annoys me, too. It's not a big deal but it's disappointing, especially in smaller fandoms, to find new fics in your fandom and then find out they're not about the canon characters.

Re: I think this is a terminology problem

(Anonymous) 2013-08-21 12:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd like to see a rant posted to FFRs about this. I was looking for it actually. I'd like to read what non anons have to say about the issue.