[ SECRET POST #2426 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2426 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 080 secrets from Secret Submission Post #347.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know what definition of feminism you are using, but there is tons of legitimate, critical, feminist scholarship of fairy tales (Marina Warner, Maria Tatar, Jack Zipes). To say "feminism" doesn't exist in that "literary culture" is frankly bizarre. If you mean they don't automatically conform to contemporary feminism, that's one thing, but Perrault, for example, was writing out of a salon tradition that among other things advocated against arranged marriages between teenage girls and old men. And even among the source tales, it's worth considering the implications of which choices Disney made among the available sources.

(I don't hate the Disney movies, but I hate that it's become "common knowledge" that all fairy tale heroines are passive, or victimized. That's never been true.)