[ SECRET POST #2427 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2427 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 068 secrets from Secret Submission Post #347.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

[(Anonymous)]

wouldn't they just use prosthetics pubic hair? i know they used merkins on Spartacus. The actresses can do whatever they wish and wear a prosthetic of what's appropriate for the show.

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

[chardmonster]

Eh, maybe.

Maybe I find the obsession with the actresses' crotch status a bit weird to begin with?

I figured being liberated meant, y'know, being liberated. Not shoved into a different box of obligations where if I don't describe my characters as properly hairy I'm a traitor to the cause. Maybe I honestly don't care!

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

[(Anonymous)]

No one is talking about being liberated or not, so what "being liberated" means is pretty much irrelevant to the conversation.

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

[anonlulz]

Exactly.

People are talking about women who are actresses, willingly signed a contract to do certain scenes, and who could have agreed (as part of that contract) to grow or not pubic hair for the shots.

And that it would have helped for the realism of the show, because some people find it jarring that poor women and hookers in a medieval setting are completely hairless down there.

Re: The implications of that policy can get disturbing

[bur]

I can just see that being on someone's resume now. Or imagine a family reunion: "So what do you do for a living?" "I manage the production and application of high-budget Hollywood crotch wigs."