case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-08-31 03:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2433 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2433 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #348.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-01 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
Sure, and when I say "hairy-legged feminist", I don't literally mean you have hairy legs, I'm just using body shaming as a metonymy for something I find unpleasant.

Oh, wait, my mistake, that's not okay EITHER.

If your justification is "It's not bullying when WE do it" then you are doing something wrong.
chardmonster: (Default)

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-09-01 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
It's totally okay to say hairy-legged feminist. I mean, people will argue with you, but you can say it. Hairy legs do send a certain cultural message. A woman who chooses not to shave her legs (in the US) is definitely making a statement. She's saying "fuck shaving." A black woman in the 1960s wearing her hair natural was often sending a message. Hell, metalheads and punk kids were definitely sending messages with their hair. Hair matters.

If you don't like the message your neckbeard sends, shave it. Otherwise, own it. But don't act like it's an integral physical feature you can change. It's one of the only things you can easily control (generally neck stubble isn't the same as a "neckbeard," before you try to argue that).
Edited 2013-09-01 03:10 (UTC)

Oh yeah...GREAT argument

(Anonymous) 2013-09-01 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)
And a woman who wears a miniskirt should just not wear miniskirts if she doesn't want to send the message that she's promiscuous. The black teenager who wears a hoodie can CHOOSE not to wear a hoodie if he doesn't want to send the message that he's a thug.

You can totally control what clothes you put on, so if you don't want to send those messages just don't wear those clothes

...just showing you what your argument opens the door for here.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
What? No, not shaving isn't making a statement. I'm not choosing to "not shave" any more then I'm choosing to "not dye the hair on my head". My default is having hair.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm actively discouraged from shaving by my doctors, after several surgeries for serious abcesses and long bouts of antibiotic treatment for serious, life-threatening infections that originated from in-grown hairs. I have a "choice" between either a neckbeard, or regular surgery PLUS inevitable shit hitting the fan when the latest inevitable infection turns out to be MRSA this time.

tl;dr Medically necessary neckbeard, motherfuckers.