[ SECRET POST #2441 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2441 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

OP's of secrets popping in

[(Anonymous)]

Not aimed at any particular OP, but I've noticed that recently we've had a lot more OP's of secrets popping in for discussions - and I can see an OP coming in to clarify something. Only so much space on a secret.

but idk how I feel about the amount of OP's of late who sit and lurk in the discussion, sometimes trying to drive the course. kinda ruining the point of it being a secret, even if they're staying anon.

Your feelings FS?

Re: OP's of secrets popping in

[(Anonymous)]

Some secrets are from f!s regulars, who generally spend quite a bit of time here. And even if they're not from regulars, sometimes people just want to talk about stuff. Why should reactions be the only people participating in a secret thread? This goes for double if it's a secret for something with a small/inactive fanbase.

Re: OP's of secrets popping in

[(Anonymous)]

I prefer the OPs chiming in in the comments because

1) if they can come to specify details, their secrets have less text and are more likely to be read than to be skipped over

2) they generate more discussions, and more activity in the comm is a-okay in my book

Re: OP's of secrets popping in

[(Anonymous)]

This. Also, I'd expect joining in the discussion is half the fun for most OP's.

Re: OP's of secrets popping in

[forgottenjester]

This too.

Re: OP's of secrets popping in

[forgottenjester]

I don't see a downside. Then again, maybe I'm biased because in the past I have discussed stuff as the OP. (Normally for clarification but occasionally to answer a question.)

I mean, shiz, normally when I respond to a secret I address it to the OP. I tell them what they did was stupid, or that they're cute, or I question them. Why shouldn't they respond if I'm talking directly to them?

Re: OP's of secrets popping in

[(Anonymous)]

Unless they deanon, I don't see how they're defeating the point? Most of the time they're clarifying their secret, arguing a point, thanking commenters or just plain contributing to the discussion, none of which I have a problem with or understand why anyone would have a problem with.