[ SECRET POST #2442 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2442 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[(Anonymous)]

Special snowflakes' bullshit genders don't count.

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[(Anonymous)]

lol, if you want to get into THAT, gender itself is a social construct so everyone is a special snowflake bullshitter, some are simply vastly more common and accepted than others! try asking 50 women how they'd define 'female' and you'd probably get much more than one answer

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[(Anonymous)]

DA

I think it's mind numbingly convoluted to say "I'm gender neutral, so I can wear "boy" clothes and "girl" clothes!"

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[chardmonster]

It's not convoluted. It's sexist. It's implying that girls can't wear boy clothes and boys can't wear girl clothes.

A lot of those genderfluid people--in places like tumblr, not everyone--appear to want rigid gender roles to exist so they can pretend to flaunt them.

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, that's pretty much why I dislike the term. One person's skirt is another person's kilt, you know?

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[(Anonymous)]

everyone is a special snowflake bullshitter

basically. i am so on board with this line of thinking.

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[(Anonymous)]

Uh, you are aware that certain countries now have "third gender" options on legal documents, including passports, right? When governments are accepting that there are more than two genders your "special snowflake bullshit genders" argument goes right out of the window.

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[(Anonymous)]

Except third gender is something related to some specific cultures and intersexuality, which is completely unrelated to the special snowflakes' made-up-just-because-not-other-label-is-good-enough-for-them genders.

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[(Anonymous)]

And just because only SOME governments have started to legally recognize their gender/lack of gender expression...it's ONLY in the countries of those governments? lol

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[chardmonster]

There's a big difference between Thai culture and I-have-a-beard-and-also-I-wear-a-tutu-so-pay-atention-sheeple

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[thene]

i'm a cis woman and you have no goddamn idea how much i wish it was socially acceptable for me to grow out a moustache

Re: why is pansexuality ok and demisexuality not?

[(Anonymous)]

+1