[ SECRET POST #2446 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2446 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________

















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]




















04. [WARNING for gore, blood, etc]

[How To Train Your Dragon]


__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for child abuse]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for torture]

[Fall Out Boy's "The Phoenix"]


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for underage]

[pokemon conquest]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #349.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[galerian-ash.livejournal.com]

...He was a very historically important warlord, not a "ruthless killer". But sure, let's say that is what he was -- it's pretty uncool to equate that to his relationship with Ranmaru.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah OP is completely taking him out of historical context, probably while doing nothing more than skim-reading a wikipedia page.

[galerian-ash.livejournal.com]

Yeah, that was the impression I got as well >:\

[(Anonymous)]

I wonder if they even read that much. To me it sounds more like fandom hearsay from people who were ignorant of any historical context in the first place.

[(Anonymous)]

Could be. It's been pretty common in video games to make Oda the big-bad (hi, Onimusha). Popular culture does what the fuck it wants with history.

[(Anonymous)]

Also, hi, Sengoku Basara and hi... about a lot of other Sengoku period themed media.

I think it's because he was the first of the three warlords and as such, lends himself perfectly as the "first boss battle" you need to go through to get to a proper unification. So he's portrayed as this OTT evil guy.

[(Anonymous)]

Are there really any warlords who couldn't be described as "ruthless killers" at least to some extent? Isn't that a large part of how you become a successful warlord?