Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-15 03:31 pm
[ SECRET POST #2448 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2448 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-15 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-16 12:19 am (UTC)(link)how does it hurt you to write 'OCs' in the tags or the drop list or in the notes or the title or wherever so people who don't want to read about stupid OC's don't have to? you save everyone, including yourself, so much time and frustration
people who don't tag their oc's deserve all the dislike they get
DA
(Anonymous) 2013-09-16 12:56 am (UTC)(link)They're just saying don't make sweeping statements about what everyone wants to read. What you want to read is not what everyone wants to read.
What part of that is so fucking difficult for you?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-16 01:31 am (UTC)(link)Not all people think OCs are automatically shitty. Nor do all people need an OC tag. Is that so hard for you to comprehend?
/reading comprehension
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-16 11:28 am (UTC)(link)So just because some people don't need an OC tag, the ones who do want an OC tag shouldn't get one? How is that fair?