[ SECRET POST #2448 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2448 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: As someone who religiously warns for OCs

[(Anonymous)]

That's pretty shitty of them. Sorry that people suck. :(

I saw a similar convo on Tumblr once, there's this big fanfic in my fandom that's popular yet hated at the same time. Personally I think it's OOC and it sucks after reading all 50 chapters, and someone went on a mini-rant about it. I agreed with them (they went back and forth with the author for a while), up until the point where they said the author should delete it. The author had already apologized for OOCness and stuff like abuse, but she refused to delete it. Which, as much as I disliked it, I'd never ask someone to do.

Re: As someone who religiously warns for OCs

[(Anonymous)]

Personally , having met people who have been abused I would say put a trigger warn for abuse. But still if they apologized that tells me they probably would have done something like that if asked.

There's no need to demand someone take down their story. I also hate the concern trolling "take down your story or you'll get flamed"

Sorry...no. I'll ignore a flame because , flaming is a stupid immature way of behaving. If I didn't write something every time I thought people would hate it I wouldn't be going into writing.

Re: As someone who religiously warns for OCs

[(Anonymous)]

Oh no, I mean I totally agree that the author should have put in warnings for abuse to begin with. She had apologized for the abuse and put in the warning after this conversation was had, she just didnt delete the fic. She responded as nicely and as best as she could have to all the flamers though. I felt bad for her. :(

Re: As someone who religiously warns for OCs

[(Anonymous)]

ah

I really hate flamers personally. Especially when they flame newbies. I personally believe that by flaming newbies, you're making it more likely that they'll be over defensive in the future, because it conditions them to have a negative experience with criticism. They start to believe criticism goes hand in hand with bashing.

(It's simple psychology really)

So when they complain about people being over-defensive I just get so mad and want to say "well quit flaming new writers then"

I value kind reviewers because online in this climate they seem very rare. I always try to be polite to them even when disagreeing because I want them to know I appreciate it. I know how being yelled at enough can make a polite review turn caustic. It's all a vicious circle really.