Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-19 06:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #2452 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2452 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Giles Coren and Sue Perkins, The Supersizers Eat… The Eighties]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Jeff Davis/Teen Wolf]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Django Unchained]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Valiant Hearts: The Great War]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Child of Light]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Jurassic Park]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Hate Plus]
__________________________________________________
09.

[The Three Investigators]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Charlie Hunnam]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
But you're right about one thing; there's no point in trying to reason with you. I'll ask Case if he simply can't ban you instead.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 06:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 03:03 am (UTC)(link)I used to know a guy with a stutter who made the most appalling jokes about stutterers. Since you feel the need to stand up to people, both online and in RL, who mock people with disabilities, would you feel the need to discipline him to protect him from himself?
I'm actually genuinely interested.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 03:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 03:39 am (UTC)(link)That said, however, I'm always interested in how these blanket statements people make about "protecting" people/groups from certain behaviors (or "speaking up on their behalf") apply when the person/group in question is the one performing the objected behavior on themselves, is genuinely benefiting from the objected to behavior, or both.