case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-19 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2452 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2452 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Giles Coren and Sue Perkins, The Supersizers Eat… The Eighties]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Jeff Davis/Teen Wolf]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Django Unchained]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Valiant Hearts: The Great War]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Child of Light]

__________________________________________________



07.
[Jurassic Park]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Hate Plus]


__________________________________________________



09.
[The Three Investigators]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Charlie Hunnam]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #350.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
This is fairly random and is actually only tangentially related to the original disagreement but I've got to ask.

I used to know a guy with a stutter who made the most appalling jokes about stutterers. Since you feel the need to stand up to people, both online and in RL, who mock people with disabilities, would you feel the need to discipline him to protect him from himself?

I'm actually genuinely interested.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT, but I think that's different in that he's trying to make either himself or the people around him less uncomfortable with the stuttering by making jokes about it.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-20 03:39 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT That's very true and, I have to admit, it worked.

That said, however, I'm always interested in how these blanket statements people make about "protecting" people/groups from certain behaviors (or "speaking up on their behalf") apply when the person/group in question is the one performing the objected behavior on themselves, is genuinely benefiting from the objected to behavior, or both.