Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-21 03:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #2454 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2454 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #351.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)But it's disingenuous to think that politeness norm, or like no one who has interest in OCs hasn't had some jerk come to them and remind them that all OCs suck or something.
Take this other thread for example http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/876886.html?thread=684870998#cmt684870998
where even if anons had something positive to say, they still felt like they had to preface their comments with "Some OCs suck!" or "I only like them if they're super well-written. It's like, yeah, we know that; it's like everything else. You don't have to give me the OC equivalent of 'no homo' in every OC thread.
I do think the OP could try to form an OC-specific community and be happier for it, but it's not really fair that OC can't be mentioned in general fandom comms.
Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)I would say they have the full right to do that if the poster is posting in a place where OCs are not the focus. If people don't like your original homemade car with the Honda tail-lights that you posted in the Honda enthusiast community, you're already starting off on the foot of "what is this doing here?"
Some people are going to go "that's a nice car, but this isn't for originals" or "I'm only interested in originals if they're super well-built" because the poster started a more or less tangential thread. Yes, they know that, yes, the poster knows that; so why did the poster post that there?
Re: ITT: People missing the point
LOL. My parents are part of their local GWRRA Chapter. My dad even chaired the chapter for a few years. Custom jobs are common. Showing up with a bike from another company was acceptable. Until I had to sell my Yamaha, I got invites to their rides. I suspect the same is true of a fair number of vehicle fandoms where you have a healthy mix of restoration and customization.
Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-21 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ITT: People missing the point
(Anonymous) 2013-09-22 02:00 am (UTC)(link)