[ SECRET POST #2459 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2459 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #351.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

No? Say you're a guy who is only turned on by men. You are not turned on by female anatomy at all. If the man is trans* and hasn't had any operation, then physically he'd have a vagina. In terms of sex, anatomy sometimes does matter. And it's not fair to call the guy transphobic just because he is not turned on by female anatomy.

[(Anonymous)]

This x100. Any surprises can be unwanted if they aren't warned for. For example, I'm not into BDSM. So I'd be pretty pissed off if a guy suddenly whipped out some handcuffs and a paddle mid-way through sex with absolutely no warning beforehand.

Expecting a warning for that isn't kink-shaming. That's just being polite.

[(Anonymous)]

This. It's not transphobic to only be turned on by penises or vaginas, unless you also want to call a straight woman vaginaphobic for not being interested in vaginas or a straight man penisphobic for having no interest in penises.