[ SECRET POST #2462 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2462 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 057 secrets from Secret Submission Post #352.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Entirely different Anon here:

"somebody who watched Sherlock the film without batting an eye"

OK... How did you do that? Seriously? I'm kind of desperate to know.

[dreemyweird]

Eye drops help

[hell, I totally wrote a detailed and serious answer before realizing it was probably a pun... Slow dmw is slow. But I laughed :D]

[(Anonymous)]

...

It wasn't a pun.

But... at least you've laughed?

/hides under the table and spends a couple of hours with knocking her head against the wall

[dreemyweird]

...
Let me join you, my friend.

Seriously? Hm, the fact that none of the characters were made to look like idiots on purpose is helpful. I learnt to enjoy unintentional hilariousness; there is something true and fresh in it, something that makes the most unbelievable cinematographic trash look better than the well-shot high-budget films with bad characterization.
Films such as Sherlock and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes (I... actually like this one) easily go beyond the upper limit of "bad" and enter the "so bad it's good" zone. The Rathbone-Bruce production, on the contrary, is excellent in so many regards that a few significant blunders can ruin it altogether.

Sherlock, though? ...We both know nothing can ruin it.

Also, isn't the red-haired chubby inventor!Watson adorable?

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, this Watson is adorable, he's the reason I watch this movie everytime it's on TV (fortunately it doesn't happen that often), and every time I end up getting more and more annoyed with Mycroft and Moriarty. And I tried to not watch... but apparently I like this Watson too much. (The last time this movie was mentioned here, an Anon (not me) called him a "geeky steampunk fan at a convention". I just... adore this guy.)

The next time I see this movie in the TV-schedule, I will try your approach. It makes sense.

And thank you!