case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-09-30 06:54 pm

[ SECRET POST #2463


⌈ Secret Post #2463 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #352.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 4 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: abortionnnn

(Anonymous) 2013-10-01 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
You need to understand one thing:

Pro-Lifers and Pro-Choicer will never reach a common ground because they believe in two fundamentally different things: Pro-Lifers believe that a fetus is already a sentient, whole human being in possession of a soul. Pro-Choicers do not believe this.
And since there is no proof for either of those opinions, there will never be an agreement. But that also doesn't make one side right and the other side wrong.

However, considering that there is actually one undisputably real, sentient human being in the equation, i.e. the future (or not) mother, it is my belief that only her well-being and choice should matter and nobody else should get a say in it.

Re: abortionnnn

(Anonymous) 2013-10-02 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
Technically, some pro-choicers think that the question of whether a fetus is sentient is irrelevant, because they believe that no person of any age has the right to occupy another person's body without her consent, and that such an invasion merits the use of force in self-defense.

Re: abortionnnn

(Anonymous) 2013-10-02 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
I'm pretty sure there's preeeetty decent proof that a fetus isn't a sentient, whole human being. Y'know. The whole underdeveloped body and brain and inability to survive outside of the womb business...

The soul part isn't testable sure, but that's entirely separate from 'sentient, whole human being'.