case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-02 06:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #2465 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2465 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Doonesbury, O Human Star]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Two of a Kind]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Cleopatra/Elizabeth Taylor]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Final Descent by Rick Yancey]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Attack on Titan]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sleepy Hollow]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Whitechapel]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Outlast]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #352.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
crunchysunrises: Marauders' Map footprints with Up To No Good written underneath them (Map - No Good)

[personal profile] crunchysunrises 2013-10-03 07:17 am (UTC)(link)
It may be the showrunner and everyone else contributing towards the final product but that doesn't change the fact that, at the end of the day, someone is in charge. And whoever that someone is is responsible for seeing that all of the different elements provided by all of the different people come together into one coherent whole. Saying that it's not X's fault because there were hundreds of other people involved in the operation is like saying it wasn't Custer's fault that his forces got decimated at the Battle of Little Big Horn.

Custer was in charge. At the end of the day, regardless of how many subordinates he had, it was his fault. Whedon is in charge. If AoS isn't any good, it's his fault.

Otherwise, you're consigning all of those people who put out amazing products on a fairly consistent basis to merely being incredibly lucky (and ignoring that at least a portion of their luck was actually hard work) and letting others who frequently put out flops off the hook because if it's all a matter of luck and lightening, then nothing is their fault anyway... including their inability to write different characters with different voices or fill in gaping plot holes.

(And no, I haven't seen AoS yet. So none of that last paragraph was specifically about Whedon. I just really, really loathe the idea that it's okay to blame the subordinates for the boss's mistakes. They're just doing what they've been told to do by the guy who actually makes the decisions.)