case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-04 07:16 pm

[ SECRET POST #2467 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2467 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Attack on Titan]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D./Phil Coulson]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Breaking Bad / Back to the Future]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #352.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-10-05 12:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Puts me in mind of Catherine Tate's "Gingers for Justice" sketches.

I don't doubt that people with red hair face verbal abuse for it, but that's just life unfortunately, some people are dicks (news at 11). If you don't have red hair then people can still abuse you for being short, or fat, or ugly, or having bad skin... the list goes on. Why do we have to categorise it as racism before we consider it to be bed?

To pick this physical aspect that people face abuse for and call it racism is absurd! If picking on someone for being a red head is racism then why not for being short, or fat, ect? Why aren't "dumb blondes" jokes considered racist? I've never really seen the term "ginger" as being offensive, but I can understand how some might considering that some people purposefully use the word derisively.