Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-10-06 03:21 pm
[ SECRET POST #2469 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2469 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

washington shooter
(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)you had everyone putting on their best psychol analyst fbi expert hat and talking about how of course it was a white man probably a teaper and then bam
Re: washington shooter
(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)although I do find it kind of funny how people DO tend to go "OMG MUST BE CRAZY RIGHT WINGER" when there's a shooting, when most of the shooters eventually turn out to be crazy LEFT wingers. Crazy is crazy and all crazy that leads to shooting is bad, but please stop acting like only one side of the political spectrum goes all shoot-happy when that's completely untrue.
Re: washington shooter
(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)[citation needed]
Re: washington shooter
Re: washington shooter
Are you like, an angry teapartier or something? I was relieved it was an unfortunate woman who'd just gone crazy and not something politically motivated but this was an unfortunate event and not particularly funny.
Re: washington shooter
Which kind of makes me wonder why the cops were shooting at her...
I don't see where any of this is amusing, though. I was annoyed by the insta-assumptions of political motivation, but it wasn't funny.
Re: washington shooter
(Anonymous) 2013-10-07 01:22 am (UTC)(link)Because she drove through several security barriers and deliberately hit a guy with her car. Guns aren't the only weapons in the world.
Re: washington shooter
Re: washington shooter
(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)Re: washington shooter
(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)I never heard anyone in the media saying it had to be a white man. The fact that it was a woman was reported right away.
Re: washington shooter
Which for the record I think was absolutely the right call. Once you go at cops with a lethal weapon (and tons of moving steel sure as hell counts) I do not expect them to come at her with anything less. Unless she was putting hands behind her head and lying down, I'd assume they were in the right in any scenario irregardless of race or who was in the car.
Re: washington shooter
(Anonymous) 2013-10-07 04:43 am (UTC)(link)I'll be the first to admit that cops have used lethal force where it isn't justified and race factors into that big-time but this... just doesn't seem like an example to me.
Re: washington shooter
(Anonymous) 2013-10-06 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: washington shooter
(Anonymous) 2013-10-07 02:56 am (UTC)(link)