[ SECRET POST #2470 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2470 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Homestuck, Teen Wolf, Supernatural and Sherlock]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Watashi ga motenai no wa dou kangaetemo omaera ga warui]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Agents of SHIELD]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Sleepy Hollow]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Fullmetal Alchemist]


__________________________________________________



08.
[World of Warcraft]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Pacific Rim]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Richard III in "The White Queen"]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[likeadeuce]

So, question, does the story acknowledge any of the way's Ed and ROY'S relationship is problematic? I don't even mean the age difference, I mean "Roy is a war criminal who enables Ed to participate in a morally dubious organization"? Or is slapstick wrench throwing the only negative dynamic that needs to be dealt with?

I mean, I don't know what canon we're going with but in first anime ROY MURDERED WINRY'S PARENTS. So focusing on Winry's negatives in order to set Roy up as an alternative seems odd to me. (I'm not particularly just talking about this story but that it seems to be a long-standing fandom trope, from what I can tell.)

[dragonimp]

It's Mangahood based. I don't remember if it specifically deals with Roy pulling Ed into the military, but it does go into Roy's past and Ishval and some moral issues around that. It also brings up Ed's temper and his tendency to run from problems (such as burning their house down) and the strain that that puts on his relationships. I'm not going to pretend there isn't a Roy/Ed bias to the fic; but it's not as one-sided as some are trying to portray it.

[likeadeuce]

Heh, I went and looked at the fic summaries and realized I had avoided the story because it's labeled 'one-sided Riza/Roy' and I can't even comprehend what that's supposed to mean.

[dragonimp]

Meaning Riza has feelings for Roy which Roy doesn't return. It wouldn't be everyone's cup of tea. It's fair reason to avoid it.

[likeadeuce]

I just think it's hilarious to announce what you DON'T ship in the header.

[dragonimp]

I don't think it's an anti-ship tag so much as warning people that it deals with a one-sided version of a popular 'ship. A reader who, say, likes Roy/Ed and also likes Royai might not want unrequited Royai in their Roy/Ed fic, so she's trying to give them a heads-up. Because of the amount of hate she's gotten she kinda over-warns.

[likeadeuce]

Where are you seeing all this hate?

ETA: Personally, I think 'one-sided' sounds much more insulting toward Riza than 'unrequited' does. I've seen the latter used to tag before, not the former.

[dragonimp]

She posts on several different coms as well as ff.net and AO3, and I can't keep track of it all. I know some of the negative reactions have come from the fm_alchemist com. I don't mean to sound like it's something that happens every day, it's more that it's been high in comparison to her other fics.

[likeadeuce]

Huh, I've never really seen any negativity on that comm (as opposed to on tumblr), which is why I was curious. Not doubting you, just wondering where this had been discussed before.