case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-10 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #2473 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2473 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Inspired by troll on P1

(Anonymous) 2013-10-11 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
That depends on whether you think that it's anti-feminist to assert that a woman's body can be owned or controlled by someone other than the woman herself. The "pro-life" movement asserts that a woman should be legally compelled to have her body used to sustain another person's life, regardless of whether she consents to this use. That doesn't seem super feminist to me, but I guess other people have other opinions.