case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-11 06:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2474 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2474 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]























07. [SPOILERS for NCIS]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Dangan Ronpa]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #353.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
fleshisyummy: (Default)

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

[personal profile] fleshisyummy 2013-10-12 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. If you had a choice between saving a couple's puppy and their baby, they would be much less sad if the puppy died. The fact of the matter is that people love other people more than animals. Nothing is going to change that.

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

(Anonymous) 2013-10-12 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
This is assuming things that are not in the scenario.

What if the baby's parents are dead? Who is going to care for it? What if it has no relatives? It'll cost people more to take care of it for 18 years and may not even end up a good person in the end.

What if the baby has no one and was going to die in a year because of a genetic disorder, and the puppy is young, healthy, and has owners that love it and would love it for 10+ more years? What if the dog is the sole companion of a frail 90 year old lady and it's the last remaining part of her family there is? What if the dog died, she'd die of heartbreak too?

You can extend any kind of scenario to this, once you start.

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

(Anonymous) 2013-10-12 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
In that case, I would be too busy freaking out about the situation that this malevolent trickster god had put me in to worry about the puppy and the baby.

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

(Anonymous) 2013-10-12 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
OP here

Pretty much. I mean if we're going to get into potential, a baby who grows up into one wonderful human being has more potential to do good than a very good dog. On the flip side, one terrible human being has much more potential to destroy things than even a very bad dog. That's why I'd rather leave the "but it could turn out so good/so bad!!" out of the equation.
fleshisyummy: (Default)

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

[personal profile] fleshisyummy 2013-10-12 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
Jeez, exactly. I was going off the general assumption that babies live longer, are more beloved, and are much more emotionally complex than puppies 99% of the time.

Re: Unpopular opinion thread

(Anonymous) 2013-10-12 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)
As long as we're sticking some epic bullshit in this, what if the puppy grows up and mauls several people to death?