case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-10-13 03:23 pm

[ SECRET POST #2476 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2476 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #354.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Statistial Application lesson ahoy

(Anonymous) 2013-10-15 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
I think it depends. If a queer person wanted to interpret a character who's canonically only been in a straight relationship to be bi, pan, biromantic, etc. that doesn't necessarily mean that they're giving the writers a freepass on queer erasure. Many slash fans like yourself aren't straight, and they might want a form of inclusion or representation when mainstream is vastly heteronormative and generally homophobic and transphobic. It's unlikely that the fact that most writers exclude lgtbq+ representation correlates to slash.

Though I understand your frustration with underrepresenting non-straight characters and having to rely on subtext when it's just text for straight characters.
nyxelestia: Rose Icon (Default)

Re: Statistial Application lesson ahoy

[personal profile] nyxelestia 2013-10-15 08:05 am (UTC)(link)
I guess I'm the kind of person who tends to think there is a line between, say, interpreting Sherlock and John's epic bromance as romance for the purposes of slash and fandom, and genuinely interpreting them as romantic in a way we just haven't seen it on-screen.

I don't think anyone is giving writers a free pass for queer erasure, far from it. I just feel like the writers end up taking that free pass anyway when fans try to insinuate that characters must actually be gay beyond fanfic/fandom and in canon.

Lose-lose situation, me thinks. :|