Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-05 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #2499 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2499 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

(Questionable Content)
__________________________________________________
03.

[Transformers]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Sherlock Holmes/C. Auguste Dupin]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Pacific Rim]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Obscurus Lupa Presents]
__________________________________________________
07.

[k-pop]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Ian McKellan and Patrick Stewart]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Neil Gaiman, Doctor Who]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Teen Wolf]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #357.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-06 01:14 am (UTC)(link)1) Moffat is still the show runner, and I don't want to hear the fandom whine like a bunch of children over Moffat's portrayal of female characters. Not that they don't have legitimate criticisms, but jfc.
2) There are really only two ways to write it, and no matter how it goes, someone will be up in arms calling bullshit on it. If they try to write a legitimate case of gender dysphoria into it, the conservatives will flip their collective bigotted shit about how the BBC is "pushing their liberal agenda", which will cause the SJWs to flip their shit at the conservatives for daring to dislike something that disagrees with their ideals. On the other hand, if they write it as just something that happens and "oh, I've got etheric beam locators!", the SJWs will still flip their just-as-bigotted shit because ~*~trans erasure~*~ or whatever the piss they want to call it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-06 04:33 am (UTC)(link)Fucking this. Like, sure, he has issues, but his virulent haters are vastly more irritating at this point.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-06 04:47 am (UTC)(link)I still think, on a superficial level, that it would be great to have a female Doctor. However, I can see why that would not work, at least right now. So, thanks for pointing this out.