[ SECRET POST #2502 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2502 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


02.



__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________

















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















14. [SPOILERS for Battlestar Galactica 2003]



__________________________________________________



15. [SPOILERS for the Snowpiercer]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for Gravity]






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #357.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 - pretty sure these are ancient repeats ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Harriet Jones shooting down the Sycorax is a pretty blatant allegory for Margaret Thatcher sinking the General Belgrano.

So to defend Harriet Jones is to defend Margaret Thatcher. Discuss.

[bringreligiontothewamwams]

Actually it is worse. Thatcher's sinking of the Belgrano was defensible in that it was known it was only leaving the engagement zone to commit to a flanking attack and the action carried out by a known asset in the area (the submarine Conquerer). The Sycorax, who were pretty stunned themselves by their own leader's show of bad faith, were by all accounts genuinely withdrawing from the engagement only to be shot in the back as they did so. Compounding the error, Harriet had to use a previously unknown asset (one of those unknown unknowns) to do it.

You can't defend Jones by defending Thatcher. What you have to do is defend Thatcher by making Jones look even worse as a dirty fighter and an incompetent one by revealing a previously unknown weapon for no military gain.